Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?

TheSmartCitizenReport.com

Investing

UK launches review on AI training using copyrighted content

The UK government has launched a consultation aimed at addressing the growing tension between AI developers and the creative industries over copyright use.

The move seeks to provide clarity on how intellectual property (IP) is acquired and used by AI firms to train their models, ensuring a balance between technological innovation and creator rights.

Amid growing legal battles, including lawsuits involving OpenAI and Stability AI, the UK is positioning itself as a leader in establishing clear copyright standards for artificial intelligence.

UK proposes measures to regulate AI training datasets

The consultation explores multiple proposals to regulate the use of copyrighted material by AI firms.

One key consideration is allowing exceptions to copyright law for AI model training, particularly for commercial purposes.

The proposals ensure that rights holders retain control by reserving their rights.

This provision would enable creators to dictate how their content is used, offering a path for fair licensing and remuneration.

In addition to protecting content creators, the government aims to offer AI developers clarity on permissible materials for model training.

The move addresses mounting concerns from artists, publishers, and content platforms whose work has been scraped to develop generative AI systems such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Stability AI’s Stable Diffusion.

Content transparency may become mandatory for AI developers

Another significant proposal focuses on increasing transparency regarding training datasets.

AI firms could be required to disclose the origin and nature of datasets used to train their models, ensuring that creators understand when their work has been utilised.

This measure directly addresses the concerns of intellectual property holders who argue that content is being used without consent or compensation.

This proposal could ignite controversy.

Tech companies remain guarded about revealing their dataset sources, citing commercial sensitivities and the risk of competitors replicating their models.

Given the commercial value of generative AI, such transparency requirements could meet resistance from AI developers keen to protect their trade secrets.

Legal battles highlight UK need for AI copyright clarity

The consultation comes at a critical time when legal disputes over AI copyright usage are intensifying globally.

Last year, The New York Times filed a lawsuit against Microsoft and OpenAI for allegedly infringing copyright by using its content to train large language models.

In the UK, Getty Images sued Stability AI for scraping millions of images without consent, a case that continues to raise questions about IP compliance for AI systems.

The UK’s efforts stand in contrast to the US, where tech lobbying often complicates legislative progress.

Industry analysts believe the UK is better positioned to prioritise personal intellectual property rights.

Under previous leadership, the government attempted a voluntary AI copyright code of practice but struggled to secure broad adoption.

Balancing creator rights and technological advancement

The proposed measures aim to balance the interests of creators and AI developers, fostering innovation while ensuring rights holders are compensated.

To achieve this, the government is encouraging collaboration between the creative and tech industries to establish widely adopted standards for rights reservation and licensing.

The growing shift towards “multimodal” AI, which integrates text, images, and video, adds urgency to the issue.

Recent developments, such as OpenAI’s AI video generation tool Sora, underscore the need for comprehensive regulations to address the evolving capabilities of AI systems.

Sora’s release highlights how AI models are expanding beyond text-based applications, amplifying the need for clarity in IP usage.

The UK’s consultation signals its intent to become a global leader in AI copyright governance.

By prioritising transparency and creator compensation, the government aims to create a framework that supports technological growth while protecting intellectual property.

The post UK launches review on AI training using copyrighted content appeared first on Invezz

Enter Your Information Below To Receive Latest News, And Articles.







    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

    You May Also Like

    BREAKING NEWS

    Israeli authorities said four Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) soldiers were killed and nearly 60 people were wounded in a drone strike on a military...

    BREAKING NEWS

    Rescue services in Israel said over 60 people were wounded, some of them critically, in a drone strike in Binyamina, Israel, which the Lebanon-based...

    BREAKING NEWS

    JOHANNESBURG – In what is described by some as electioneering and a last-minute attempt to leave a legacy, some observers say President Biden and...

    BREAKING NEWS

    Former President Trump ripped President Biden for going weeks without speaking with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as war continues raging in the nation,...

    BREAKING NEWS

    Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump are locked in an extremely tight contest for the White House, with voters virtually split...

    BREAKING NEWS

    Voters in storm-ravaged parts of the Southeast could face new hurdles at the ballot box this year following the destruction wrought by Hurricanes Helene...

    BREAKING NEWS

    Former National Institutes of Health employee Margaret Moore, accused by Republicans of helping others shield emails from the public, invoked her Fifth Amendment right...

    BREAKING NEWS

    A ‘painful’Israeli response weighs over the heads of the Iranian regime after their ballistic missile attacks on Tel Aviv on Tuesday.  President Joe Biden has...

    Disclaimer: TheSmartCitizenReport.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice.

    The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.